apparently 923 and 924 are supported way earlier
it's REALLY confusing apparently because yes those clients DO handle those codes, but HOW?
makes me want to throw out the error code tables because it seems like different clients implement them in different ways with no established rule, especially those two because only 924 doesn't appear in plain text in the main binary until P7, but it absolutely exists before then?
And for 923... I don't even know. It's not in the main binary (at all). Let alone in later versions.
Added new section to Protocols (half done with it though): Changes to error codes, to ask "When did that error code get implemented and when did it get removed" Probably could be made better, eh.
5 Commands Remain.
New change record, too.
added:
+ ABService landing page
+ SharingService landing page
+ MsgrConfig fully
* moved command table to table of commands because it was being annoying there exclusively
information for MSNP4 found: adds the client codebase parameter to SND and CVR (and an empty to CVQ, but that lasted all the way to MSNP7 lol, does that for MSNP3 fallback too which is kind of funny)
18 commands left.
+ ADD
+ REM
+ URL
* fixed a bunch of formatting
* changed the default list version to 255, if it increases to 256 it means it changed
* fixed a bunch of muscle memory mishaps
* Clean-up some missing "fill this in once information is available's
USR is very big and would consider a break here
... Why does the spec imply that Switchboard has INF? Is that why every client implements it after MSNP8?
the relevant strings exist in 3.6.003x, but are they actually used? in MSNP7+ clients they are, but i'm wondering about MSNP6 exclusively here.
Information also needed: What shows the "Account needs to be verified before using the service" dialog? it's not 924, it's not implemented.
Updated main page with requests for this information.
yellows111