While admirable as a means to ensure immutability, this has the
unfortunate downside of making the class non-movable. std::move cannot
actually perform a move operation if the provided operand has const data
members (std::move acts as an operation to "slide" resources out of an
object instance). Given Barrier contains move-only types such as
std::mutex, this can lead to confusing error messages if an object ever
contained a Barrier instance and said object was attempted to be moved.
This is also unused and superceded by standard functionality. The
standard library provides std::this_thread::sleep_for(), which provides
a much more flexible interface, as different time units can be used with
it.
This is an old function that's no longer necessary. C++11 introduced
proper threading support to the language and a thread ID can be
retrieved via std::this_thread::get_id() if it's ever needed.
This is an analog of BitSet from Dolphin that was introduced to allow
iterating over a set of bits. Given it's currently unused, and given
that std::bitset exists, we can remove this. If it's ever needed in the
future it can be brought back.
Xbyak is currently entirely unused. Rather than carting it along, remove
it and get rid of a dependency. If it's ever needed in the future, then
it can be re-added (and likely be more up to date at that point in
time).
The interface for shared memory was changed, but another commit was
merged that relied on the (previously public) internals of SharedMemory.
This amends that discrepancy.
The decision was made to name them LayeredExeFS instead of just LayeredFS to differentiate from normal RomFS-based mods. The name may be long/unweildy, but conveys the meaning well.
Currently, there's no way to specify if an assertion should
conditionally occur due to unimplemented behavior. This is useful when
something is only partially implemented (e.g. due to ongoing RE work).
In particular, this would be useful within the graphics code.
The rationale behind this is it allows a dev to disable unimplemented
feature assertions (which can occur in an unrelated work area), while
still enabling regular assertions, which act as behavior guards for
conditions or states which must not occur. Previously, the only way a
dev could temporarily disable asserts, was to disable the regular
assertion macros, which has the downside of also disabling, well, the
regular assertions which hold more sanitizing value, as opposed to
unimplemented feature assertions.
Currently, this was only performing a logging call, which doesn't
actually invoke any assertion behavior. This is unlike
UNIMPLEMENTED_MSG, which *does* assert.
This makes the expected behavior uniform across both macros.
bunnei
Lioncash
Zach Hilman
ReinUsesLisp
greggameplayer
FernandoS27