This fixes the help template so that if a command
includes a Long form help message that is displayed instead
of ignoring it and always showing the Short message.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hiltgen <daniel.hiltgen@docker.com>
As for top-level key, any 3rd-level key which starts with `x-` will be
ignored by compose. This allows for users to:
* include additional metadata in their compose files
* create YAML anchor objects that can be re-used in other parts of the config
This matches a similar feature in the swagger spec definition:
https://swagger.io/specification/#specificationExtensions
This means a composefile like the following is valid
```
verison: "3.7"
services:
foo:
image: foo/bar
x-foo: bar
network:
bar:
x-bar: baz
```
It concerns services, volumes, networks, configs and secrets.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
- Build image that contains everything needed to run e2e tests
- Add ability to run e2e tests against an endpoint
Signed-off-by: Christopher Crone <christopher.crone@docker.com>
Add validation for stack names to prevent an empty name resulting in _all_
stacks to be returned after filtering, which can result in removal of services
for all stacks if `--prune`, or `docker stack rm` is used.
Before this change;
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml one
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml two
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml three
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml --prune ''
Removing service one_web
Removing service two_web
Removing service three_web
After this change:
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml one
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml two
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml three
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml --prune ''
invalid stack name: ""
Other stack commands were updated as well:
Before this change;
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml ''
Creating network _default
failed to create network _default: Error response from daemon: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = name must be valid as a DNS name component
docker stack ps ''
nothing found in stack:
docker stack rm ''
Removing service one_web
Removing service three_web
Removing service two_web
After this change:
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml ''
invalid stack name: ""
docker stack ps ''
invalid stack name: ""
docker stack rm ''
invalid stack name: ""
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
- Don't wrap the code to be slightly more readable
- Rename `getServiceFilter()` to `getStackServiceFilter()` to be
consistent with other helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
* Add "kubernetes" struct in config file with "allNamespaces" option, to opt-out this behavior when set as "disabled"
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Champlon <mathieu.champlon@docker.com>
`docker stack services --filter=label=foo=bar --filter=label=foo=baz my-stack` with Swarm gets handled as `filter on (a label named foo with value bar) AND (a label named foo with value baz).
This obviously yields an empty result set every time, but if and how this should be changed is out of scope here, so simply align Kubernetes with Swarm for now.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Champlon <mathieu.champlon@docker.com>
Before this change:
----------------------------------------------------
Create a service with reservations and limits for memory and cpu:
docker service create --name test \
--limit-memory=100M --limit-cpu=1 \
--reserve-memory=100M --reserve-cpu=1 \
nginx:alpine
Verify the configuration
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just CPU limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-cpu=2 --reserve-cpu=2 test
Notice that the memory limit and reservation is not preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000
}
}
Update just Memory limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-memory=200M --reserve-memory=200M test
Notice that the CPU limit and reservation is not preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
},
"Reservations": {
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
}
}
After this change:
----------------------------------------------------
Create a service with reservations and limits for memory and cpu:
docker service create --name test \
--limit-memory=100M --limit-cpu=1 \
--reserve-memory=100M --reserve-cpu=1 \
nginx:alpine
Verify the configuration
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 1000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just CPU limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-cpu=2 --reserve-cpu=2 test
Confirm that the CPU limits/reservations are updated, but memory limit and reservation are preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 104857600
}
}
Update just Memory limit and reservation:
docker service update --limit-memory=200M --reserve-memory=200M test
Confirm that the Mempry limits/reservations are updated, but CPU limit and reservation are preserved:
docker service inspect --format '{{json .Spec.TaskTemplate.Resources}}' test
{
"Limits": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
},
"Reservations": {
"NanoCPUs": 2000000000,
"MemoryBytes": 209715200
}
}
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Daniel Hiltgen
Silvin
Vincent Demeester
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Silvin Lubecki
Vincent Demeester
Christopher Crone
Zachary Romero
Mathieu Champlon
Simon Ferquel
taiji-tech
Tibor Vass
Anda Xu
Victor Vieux