This confused me fore a bit, because I thought the test was checking for
an actual `context.Canceled` error (which is spelled "context canceled"
with a single "l". But then I found that this was a string that's printed
as part of a test-utility, just looking very similar but with the British
spelling ("cancelled").
Let's change this to a message that's unique for the test, also to make it
more grep'able.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Improve the output for these validation errors:
- Removes the short command description from the output. This information
does not provide much useful help, and distracts from the error message.
- Reduces punctuation, and
- Prefixes the error message with the binary / root-command name
(usually `docker:`) to be consistent with other similar errors.
- Adds an empty line between the error-message and the "call to action"
(`Run 'docker volume --help'...` in the example below). This helps
separating the error message and "usage" from the call-to-action.
Before this patch:
$ docker volume ls one two three
"docker volume ls" accepts no arguments.
See 'docker volume ls --help'.
Usage: docker volume ls [OPTIONS]
List volumes
$ docker volume create one two three
"docker volume create" requires at most 1 argument.
See 'docker volume create --help'.
Usage: docker volume create [OPTIONS] [VOLUME]
Create a volume
With this patch:
$ docker volume ls one two three
docker: 'docker volume ls' accepts no arguments
Usage: docker volume ls [OPTIONS]
Run 'docker volume ls --help' for more information
$ docker voludocker volume create one two three
docker: 'docker volume create' requires at most 1 argument
Usage: docker volume create [OPTIONS] [VOLUME]
SRun 'docker volume create --help' for more information
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Before this patch, output for invalid top-level and sub-commands differed.
For top-level commands, the CLI would print an error-message and a suggestion
to use `--help`. For missing *subcommands*, we would hit a different code-path,
and different output, which includes full "usage" / "help" output.
While it is a common convention to show usage output, and may have been
a nice gesture when docker was still young and only had a few commands
and options ("you did something wrong; here's an overview of what you
can use"), that's no longer the case, and many commands have a _very_
long output.
The result of this is that the error message, which is the relevant
information in this case - "You mis-typed something" - is lost in the
output, and hard to find (sometimes even requiring scrolling back).
The output is also confusing, because it _looks_ like something ran
successfully (most of the output is not about the error!).
Even further; the suggested resolution (try `--help` to see the correct
options) is rather redundant, because running teh command with `--help`
produces _exactly_ the same output as was just showh, baring the error
message. As a fun fact, due to the usage output being printed, the
output even contains not one, but _two_ "call to actions";
- `See 'docker volume --help'.` (under the erro message)
- `Run 'docker volume COMMAND --help' for more information on a command.`
(under the usage output)
In short; the output is too verbose, confusing, and doesn't provide
a good UX. Let's reduce the output produced so that the focus is on the
important information.
This patch:
- Changes the usage to the short-usage.
- Changes the error-message to mention the _full_ command instead of only
the command after `docker` (so `docker no-such-command` instead of
`no-such-command`).
- Prefixes the error message with the binary / root-command name
(usually `docker:`); this is something we can still decide on, but
it's a pattern we already use in some places. The motivation for this
is that `docker` commands can often produce output that's a combination
of output from the CLI itself, output from the daemon, and even output
from the container. The `docker:` prefix helps to distinguish where
the message originated from (the `docker` CLI in this case).
- Adds an empty line between the error-message and the "call to action"
(`Run 'docker volume --help'...` in the example below). This helps
separating the error message ("unkown flag") from the call-to-action.
Before this patch:
Unknown top-level command:
docker nosuchcommand foo
docker: 'nosuchcommand' is not a docker command.
See 'docker --help'
Unknown sub-command:
docker volume nosuchcommand foo
Usage: docker volume COMMAND
Manage volumes
Commands:
create Create a volume
inspect Display detailed information on one or more volumes
ls List volumes
prune Remove unused local volumes
rm Remove one or more volumes
update Update a volume (cluster volumes only)
Run 'docker volume COMMAND --help' for more information on a command.
After this patch:
Unknown top-level command:
docker nosuchcommand foo
docker: unknown command: docker nosuchcommand
Run 'docker --help' for more information
Unknown sub-command:
docker volume nosuchcommand foo
docker: unknown command: 'docker volume nosuchcommand'
Usage: docker volume COMMAND
Run 'docker volume --help' for more information
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
This error didn't do a great job at formatting. If a StatusError was
produced without a Status message, it would print a very non-informative
error, with information missing.
Let's update the output:
- If a status-message is provided; print just that (after all the
status code is something that can be found from the shell, e.g.
through `echo $?` in Bash).
- If no status-message is provided: print a message more similar to
Go's `exec.ExecError`, which uses `os.rocessState.String()` (see [1]).
Before this patch, an error without custom status would print:
Status: , Code: 2
After this patch:
exit status 2
In situations where a custom error-message is provided, the error-message
is print as-is, whereas before this patch, the message got combined with
the `Status:` and `Code:`, which resulted in some odd output.
Before this patch:
docker volume --no-such-flag
Status: unknown flag: --no-such-flag
See 'docker volume --help'.
Usage: docker volume COMMAND
Manage volumes
Commands:
create Create a volume
inspect Display detailed information on one or more volumes
ls List volumes
prune Remove unused local volumes
rm Remove one or more volumes
update Update a volume (cluster volumes only)
Run 'docker volume COMMAND --help' for more information on a command.
, Code: 125
With this patch, the error is shown as-is;
docker volume --no-such-flag
unknown flag: --no-such-flag
See 'docker volume --help'.
Usage: docker volume COMMAND
Manage volumes
Commands:
create Create a volume
inspect Display detailed information on one or more volumes
ls List volumes
prune Remove unused local volumes
rm Remove one or more volumes
update Update a volume (cluster volumes only)
Run 'docker volume COMMAND --help' for more information on a command.
While the exit-code is no longer printed, it's still properly handled;
echo $?
125
[1]: 82c14346d8/src/os/exec_posix.go (L107-L135)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Trying to make the logic slightly clearer, and adding a custom
message for the skip,
Before this:
=== RUN TestSplitCpArg/absolute_path_with_drive
cp_test.go:184: tc.os == "windows" && runtime.GOOS != "windows" || tc.os == "linux" && runtime.GOOS == "windows"
After this:
=== RUN TestSplitCpArg/absolute_path_with_drive
cp_test.go:184: skipping windows test on non-windows platform
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Introduce a (non-exported) ipamOptions that collects all options for
creating a network.IPAM, so that this utility is more atomic (potentially
even could be moved to a separate package and exported).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
- https://github.com/golang/go/issues?q=milestone%3AGo1.21.12+label%3ACherryPickApproved
- full diff: https://github.com/golang/go/compare/go1.21.11...go1.21.12
These minor releases include 1 security fixes following the security policy:
net/http: denial of service due to improper 100-continue handling
The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next request sent on the connection will fail.
An attacker sending a request to a net/http/httputil.ReverseProxy proxy can exploit this mishandling to cause a denial of service by sending "Expect: 100-continue" requests which elicit a non-informational response from the backend. Each such request leaves the proxy with an invalid connection, and causes one subsequent request using that connection to fail.
Thanks to Geoff Franks for reporting this issue.
This is CVE-2024-24791 and Go issue https://go.dev/issue/67555.
View the release notes for more information:
https://go.dev/doc/devel/release#go1.21.12
**- Description for the changelog**
```markdown changelog
Update Go runtime to 1.21.12
```
Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Paweł Gronowski
Laura Brehm
David Karlsson
Dan Wallis
Alano Terblanche