This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit ab230240ad)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
- Handle `bundlefile` directly in the `top-level`
command. `bundlefile` is still experimental and will be deprecated
in future version — this should make be easier to remove it.
- Validate the `stack` name in all cases (i.e. whatever the
orchestrator is used)
- Load the composefile ahead of choosing the orchestrator. This
removes some slight duplication.
- Makes `RunDeploy` easier to use from outside packages (like
`docker/app`) with a preloaded configuration.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vincent@sbr.pm>
* Renaming DOCKER_ORCHESTRATOR to DOCKER_STACK_ORCHESTRATOR
* Renaming config file option "orchestrator" to "stackOrchestrator"
* "--orchestrator" flag is no more global but local to stack command and subcommands
* Cleaning all global orchestrator code
* Replicating Hidden flags in help and Supported flags from root command to stack command
Signed-off-by: Silvin Lubecki <silvin.lubecki@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: French Ben <frenchben@docker.com>
Update for the test to capture the proper removal
Signed-off-by: French Ben <frenchben@docker.com>
Satisfy lint length limit
Signed-off-by: French Ben <frenchben@docker.com>
Updated e2e test
Signed-off-by: French Ben <frenchben@docker.com>
When running `docker stack rm <some stack>` against an older daemon,
a warning was printed for "configs" being ignored;
WARNING: ignoring "configs" (requires API version 1.30, but the Docker daemon API version is 1.26)
Given that an old daemon cannot _have_ configs, there should not be
a need to warn, or _attempt_ to remove these resources.
This patch removes the warning, and skips fetching (and removing)
configs.
A check if _secrets_ are supported by the daemon is also added,
given that this would result in an error when attempted against
an older (pre 1.13) daemon.
There is one situation where this could lead to secrets or
configs being left behind; if the client is connecting to a
daemon that _does_ support secrets, configs, but the API version
is overridden using `DOCKER_API_VERSION`, no warning is printed,
and secrets and configs are not attempted to be removed.
Given that `DOCKER_API_VERSION` is regarded a feature for
debugging / "power users", it should be ok to ignore this.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Nicolas De Loof
Vincent Demeester
Silvin Lubecki
Daniel Nephin
French Ben
Vincent Demeester
Arash Deshmeh
John Stephens
Daniel Nephin