For moby/moby PR 45025 (Docker v24, API v1.43).
`docker run --annotation foo=bar` is similar to `podman run --annotation foo=bar`,
however, unlike Podman, Docker implementation also accepts an annotation with an empty value.
(`docker run --annotation foo`)
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
The code is similar to that used by the volume rm subcommand, however,
one difference I noticed was VolumeRemove takes the force flag/option
was a parameter. This isn't the case for NetworkRemove.
To get NetworkRemove to take a similar parameter, this would require
modifying the Docker daemon. For now this isn't a route I wish to take
when the code can be arrange to mimic the same behavior.
Co-authored-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Signed-off-by: Conner Crosby <conner@cavcrosby.tech>
This implements a special "RESET" value that can be used to reset the
list of capabilities to add/drop when updating a service.
Given the following service;
| CapDrop | CapAdd |
| -------------- | ------------- |
| CAP_SOME_CAP | |
When updating the service, and applying `--cap-drop RESET`, the "drop" list
is reset to its default:
| CapDrop | CapAdd |
| -------------- | ------------- |
| | |
When updating the service, and applying `--cap-drop RESET`, combined with
`--cap-add CAP_SOME_CAP` and `--cap-drop CAP_SOME_OTHER_CAP`:
| CapDrop | CapAdd |
| -------------- | ------------- |
| CAP_FOO_CAP | CAP_SOME_CAP |
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
When creating and updating services, we need to avoid unneeded service churn.
The interaction of separate lists to "add" and "drop" capabilities, a special
("ALL") capability, as well as a "relaxed" format for accepted capabilities
(case-insensitive, `CAP_` prefix optional) make this rather involved.
This patch updates how we handle `--cap-add` / `--cap-drop` when _creating_ as
well as _updating_, with the following rules/assumptions applied:
- both existing (service spec) and new (values passed through flags or in
the compose-file) are normalized and de-duplicated before use.
- the special "ALL" capability is equivalent to "all capabilities" and taken
into account when normalizing capabilities. Combining "ALL" capabilities
and other capabilities is therefore equivalent to just specifying "ALL".
- adding capabilities takes precedence over dropping, which means that if
a capability is both set to be "dropped" and to be "added", it is removed
from the list to "drop".
- the final lists should be sorted and normalized to reduce service churn
- no validation of capabilities is handled by the client. Validation is
delegated to the daemon/server.
When deploying a service using a docker-compose file, the docker-compose file
is *mostly* handled as being "declarative". However, many of the issues outlined
above also apply to compose-files, so similar handling is applied to compose
files as well to prevent service churn.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
- Add support for --gpus to run/create container in bash and zsh
- Remove --group from run and update container as it's not a valid flag in zsh
- Add --group-add --group-rm for create and update update service in bash
Signed-off-by: Richard Chen Zheng <58443436+rchenzheng@users.noreply.github.com>
The `docker push` command up until [v0.9.1](https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/v0.9.1/api/client.go#L998)
always pushed all tags of a given image, so `docker push foo/bar` would push (e.g.)
all of `foo/bar:latest`, `foo:/bar:v1`, `foo/bar:v1.0.0`.
Pushing all tags of an image was not desirable in many case, so docker v0.10.0
enhanced `docker push` to optionally specify a tag to push (`docker push foo/bar:v1`)
(see https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/3411 and the pull request that implemented
this: https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/4948).
This behavior exists up until today, and is confusing, because unlike other commands,
`docker push` does not default to use the `:latest` tag when omitted, but instead
makes it push "all tags of the image"
For example, in the following situation;
```
docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
thajeztah/myimage latest b534869c81f0 41 hours ago 1.22MB
```
Running `docker push thajeztah/myimage` seemingly does the expected behavior (it
pushes `thajeztah/myimage:latest` to Docker Hub), however, it does not so for the
reason expected (`:latest` being the default tag), but because `:latest` happens
to be the only tag present for the `thajeztah/myimage` image.
If another tag exists for the image:
```
docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
thajeztah/myimage latest b534869c81f0 41 hours ago 1.22MB
thajeztah/myimage v1.0.0 b534869c81f0 41 hours ago 1.22MB
```
Running the same command (`docker push thajeztah/myimage`) will push _both_ images
to Docker Hub.
> Note that the behavior described above is currently not (clearly) documented;
> the `docker push` reference documentation (https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/push/)
does not mention that omitting the tag will push all tags
This patch changes the default behavior, and if no tag is specified, `:latest` is
assumed. To push _all_ tags, a new flag (`-a` / `--all-tags`) is added, similar
to the flag that's present on `docker pull`.
With this change:
- `docker push myname/myimage` will be the equivalent of `docker push myname/myimage:latest`
- to push all images, the user needs to set a flag (`--all-tags`), so `docker push --all-tags myname/myimage:latest`
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Akihiro Suda
Laura Brehm
CrazyMax
Ville Skyttä
CrazyMax
Tianon Gravi
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Sebastiaan van Stijn
Harald Albers
Conner Crosby
Chee Hau Lim
Vardan Pogosian
Ulysses Souza
Anca Iordache
Brian Goff
Jennings Zhang
Tibor Vass
Albin Kerouanton
Richard Chen Zheng
horpto
Brian Wieder
Rob Gulewich