This test uses two subtests that were sharing the same variable.
Subtests run in a goroutine, which could lead to them concurrently
accessing the variable, resulting in a panic:
=== FAIL: cli/command/container TestRemoveForce/without_force (0.00s)
Error: Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
--- FAIL: TestRemoveForce/without_force (0.00s)
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x40393f]
goroutine 190 [running]:
testing.tRunner.func1.2({0xb76380, 0x124c9a0})
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1389 +0x24e
testing.tRunner.func1()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1392 +0x39f
panic({0xb76380, 0x124c9a0})
/usr/local/go/src/runtime/panic.go:838 +0x207
sort.StringSlice.Less(...)
/usr/local/go/src/sort/sort.go:319
sort.insertionSort({0xd87380, 0xc00051b3b0}, 0x0, 0x2)
/usr/local/go/src/sort/sort.go:40 +0xb1
sort.quickSort({0xd87380, 0xc00051b3b0}, 0x18?, 0xb4f060?, 0xc000540e01?)
/usr/local/go/src/sort/sort.go:222 +0x171
sort.Sort({0xd87380, 0xc00051b3b0})
/usr/local/go/src/sort/sort.go:231 +0x53
sort.Strings(...)
/usr/local/go/src/sort/sort.go:335
github.com/docker/cli/cli/command/container.TestRemoveForce.func2(0xc0005389c0?)
/go/src/github.com/docker/cli/cli/command/container/rm_test.go:36 +0x125
testing.tRunner(0xc00053e4e0, 0xc00051b140)
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1439 +0x102
created by testing.(*T).Run
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1486 +0x35f
=== FAIL: cli/command/container TestRemoveForce (0.00s)
This patch changes the test to use to separate variables.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Sebastiaan van Stijn