2017-07-15 19:03:17 -04:00
|
|
|
package system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
"context"
|
test spring-cleaning
This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit ab230240ad44fdffa03558a3dbb47971f6336911)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2024-07-03 19:29:04 -04:00
|
|
|
"io"
|
2017-07-15 19:03:17 -04:00
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/cli/cli/config/configfile"
|
2017-08-21 16:30:09 -04:00
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/cli/internal/test"
|
2024-06-09 07:54:37 -04:00
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/api/types/container"
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/api/types/filters"
|
2024-06-06 20:31:09 -04:00
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/api/types/network"
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
"github.com/pkg/errors"
|
2020-02-22 12:12:14 -05:00
|
|
|
"gotest.tools/v3/assert"
|
|
|
|
is "gotest.tools/v3/assert/cmp"
|
2017-07-15 19:03:17 -04:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-20 17:54:31 -05:00
|
|
|
func TestPrunePromptPre131DoesNotIncludeBuildCache(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-07-15 19:03:17 -04:00
|
|
|
cli := test.NewFakeCli(&fakeClient{version: "1.30"})
|
2017-07-18 09:26:45 -04:00
|
|
|
cmd := newPruneCommand(cli)
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
|
test spring-cleaning
This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit ab230240ad44fdffa03558a3dbb47971f6336911)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2024-07-03 19:29:04 -04:00
|
|
|
cmd.SetOut(io.Discard)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetErr(io.Discard)
|
2024-04-02 09:44:23 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, cmd.Execute(), "system prune has been cancelled")
|
2017-12-20 17:54:31 -05:00
|
|
|
expected := `WARNING! This will remove:
|
2018-11-17 10:53:02 -05:00
|
|
|
- all stopped containers
|
|
|
|
- all networks not used by at least one container
|
|
|
|
- all dangling images
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-20 17:54:31 -05:00
|
|
|
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N] `
|
2018-03-05 18:53:52 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(expected, cli.OutBuffer().String()))
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPrunePromptFilters(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-11-17 10:53:02 -05:00
|
|
|
cli := test.NewFakeCli(&fakeClient{version: "1.31"})
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
cli.SetConfigFile(&configfile.ConfigFile{
|
|
|
|
PruneFilters: []string{"label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
cmd := newPruneCommand(cli)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetArgs([]string{"--filter", "until=24h", "--filter", "label=hello-world", "--filter", "label!=foo=bar", "--filter", "label=bar=baz"})
|
test spring-cleaning
This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit ab230240ad44fdffa03558a3dbb47971f6336911)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2024-07-03 19:29:04 -04:00
|
|
|
cmd.SetOut(io.Discard)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetErr(io.Discard)
|
2017-12-20 17:54:31 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2024-04-02 09:44:23 -04:00
|
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, cmd.Execute(), "system prune has been cancelled")
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
expected := `WARNING! This will remove:
|
2018-11-17 10:53:02 -05:00
|
|
|
- all stopped containers
|
|
|
|
- all networks not used by at least one container
|
|
|
|
- all dangling images
|
2023-11-28 05:53:13 -05:00
|
|
|
- unused build cache
|
2018-11-17 10:53:02 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items to be pruned will be filtered with:
|
|
|
|
- label!=foo=bar
|
|
|
|
- label!=never=remove-me
|
|
|
|
- label=bar=baz
|
|
|
|
- label=hello-world
|
|
|
|
- label=remove=me
|
|
|
|
- until=24h
|
|
|
|
|
Fix system prune warning missing filters from config-file
The warning, printed before runing docker system prune was missing any filter
that was set in the configuration file. In addition, the warning prefixes the
filters with `label=`, which is no longer accurate, now that the prune command
also supports "until" as a filter.
Before this change, only the filters set on the command-line were shown,
and any filter set in the configuration file was missing;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- label={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N]
```
With this patch applied, both options from the commandline and options set
in the configuration file are shown;
```
mkdir -p ./test-config
echo '{"pruneFilters": ["label!=never=remove-me", "label=remove=me"]}' > test-config/config.json
docker --config=./test-config system prune --filter until=24h --filter label=hello-world --filter label!=foo=bar --filter label=bar=baz
WARNING! This will remove:
- all stopped containers
- all networks not used by at least one container
- all dangling images
- all dangling build cache
- Elements to be pruned will be filtered with:
- filter={"label":{"bar=baz":true,"hello-world":true,"remove=me":true},"label!":{"foo=bar":true,"never=remove-me":true},"until":{"24h":true}}
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2018-11-17 10:00:37 -05:00
|
|
|
Are you sure you want to continue? [y/N] `
|
|
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(expected, cli.OutBuffer().String()))
|
2017-07-15 19:03:17 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestSystemPrunePromptTermination(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
|
|
|
t.Cleanup(cancel)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cli := test.NewFakeCli(&fakeClient{
|
2024-06-09 07:54:37 -04:00
|
|
|
containerPruneFunc: func(ctx context.Context, pruneFilters filters.Args) (container.PruneReport, error) {
|
|
|
|
return container.PruneReport{}, errors.New("fakeClient containerPruneFunc should not be called")
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
2024-06-06 20:31:09 -04:00
|
|
|
networkPruneFunc: func(ctx context.Context, pruneFilters filters.Args) (network.PruneReport, error) {
|
|
|
|
return network.PruneReport{}, errors.New("fakeClient networkPruneFunc should not be called")
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmd := newPruneCommand(cli)
|
test spring-cleaning
This makes a quick pass through our tests;
Discard output/err
----------------------------------------------
Many tests were testing for error-conditions, but didn't discard output.
This produced a lot of noise when running the tests, and made it hard
to discover if there were actual failures, or if the output was expected.
For example:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: "create" requires exactly 2 arguments.
See 'create --help'.
Usage: create [OPTIONS] CONFIG file|- [flags]
Create a config from a file or STDIN
Error: error creating config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
And after discarding output:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
Use sub-tests where possible
----------------------------------------------
Some tests were already set-up to use test-tables, and even had a usable
name (or in some cases "error" to check for). Change them to actual sub-
tests. Same test as above, but now with sub-tests and output discarded:
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01
=== RUN TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/requires_exactly_2_arguments#01 (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestConfigCreateErrors/error_creating_config (0.00s)
PASS
It's not perfect in all cases (in the above, there's duplicate "expected"
errors, but Go conveniently adds "#01" for the duplicate). There's probably
also various tests I missed that could still use the same changes applied;
we can improve these in follow-ups.
Set cmd.Args to prevent test-failures
----------------------------------------------
When running tests from my IDE, it compiles the tests before running,
then executes the compiled binary to run the tests. Cobra doesn't like
that, because in that situation `os.Args` is taken as argument for the
command that's executed. The command that's tested now sees the test-
flags as arguments (`-test.v -test.run ..`), which causes various tests
to fail ("Command XYZ does not accept arguments").
# compile the tests:
go test -c -o foo.test
# execute the test:
./foo.test -test.v -test.run TestFoo
=== RUN TestFoo
Error: "foo" accepts no arguments.
The Cobra maintainers ran into the same situation, and for their own
use have added a special case to ignore `os.Args` in these cases;
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L1078-L1083
args := c.args
// Workaround FAIL with "go test -v" or "cobra.test -test.v", see #155
if c.args == nil && filepath.Base(os.Args[0]) != "cobra.test" {
args = os.Args[1:]
}
Unfortunately, that exception is too specific (only checks for `cobra.test`),
so doesn't automatically fix the issue for other test-binaries. They did
provide a `cmd.SetArgs()` utility for this purpose
https://github.com/spf13/cobra/blob/v1.8.1/command.go#L276-L280
// SetArgs sets arguments for the command. It is set to os.Args[1:] by default, if desired, can be overridden
// particularly useful when testing.
func (c *Command) SetArgs(a []string) {
c.args = a
}
And the fix is to explicitly set the command's args to an empty slice to
prevent Cobra from falling back to using `os.Args[1:]` as arguments.
cmd := newSomeThingCommand()
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
Some tests already take this issue into account, and I updated some tests
for this, but there's likely many other ones that can use the same treatment.
Perhaps the Cobra maintainers would accept a contribution to make their
condition less specific and to look for binaries ending with a `.test`
suffix (which is what compiled binaries usually are named as).
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit ab230240ad44fdffa03558a3dbb47971f6336911)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2024-07-03 19:29:04 -04:00
|
|
|
cmd.SetArgs([]string{})
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetOut(io.Discard)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetErr(io.Discard)
|
2024-03-12 07:38:47 -04:00
|
|
|
test.TerminatePrompt(ctx, t, cmd, cli)
|
2024-02-21 10:36:17 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|