Return zero exit-code when force-removing non-existing containers
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2020-08-14 10:04:32 -04:00
|
|
|
package container
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"context"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"io/ioutil"
|
|
|
|
"sort"
|
2023-01-04 04:47:46 -05:00
|
|
|
"sync"
|
Return zero exit-code when force-removing non-existing containers
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2020-08-14 10:04:32 -04:00
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/cli/internal/test"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/api/types"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/errdefs"
|
|
|
|
"gotest.tools/v3/assert"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestRemoveForce(t *testing.T) {
|
2023-01-04 04:47:46 -05:00
|
|
|
for _, tc := range []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
args []string
|
|
|
|
expectedErr string
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{name: "without force", args: []string{"nosuchcontainer", "mycontainer"}, expectedErr: "no such container"},
|
|
|
|
{name: "with force", args: []string{"--force", "nosuchcontainer", "mycontainer"}, expectedErr: ""},
|
|
|
|
} {
|
|
|
|
tc := tc
|
|
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
var removed []string
|
|
|
|
mutex := new(sync.Mutex)
|
Return zero exit-code when force-removing non-existing containers
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2020-08-14 10:04:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-04 04:47:46 -05:00
|
|
|
cli := test.NewFakeCli(&fakeClient{
|
|
|
|
containerRemoveFunc: func(ctx context.Context, container string, options types.ContainerRemoveOptions) error {
|
|
|
|
// containerRemoveFunc is called in parallel for each container
|
|
|
|
// by the remove command so append must be synchronized.
|
|
|
|
mutex.Lock()
|
|
|
|
removed = append(removed, container)
|
|
|
|
mutex.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if container == "nosuchcontainer" {
|
|
|
|
return errdefs.NotFound(fmt.Errorf("Error: no such container: " + container))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Version: "1.36",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
cmd := NewRmCommand(cli)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetOut(ioutil.Discard)
|
|
|
|
cmd.SetArgs(tc.args)
|
Return zero exit-code when force-removing non-existing containers
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2020-08-14 10:04:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-04 04:47:46 -05:00
|
|
|
err := cmd.Execute()
|
|
|
|
if tc.expectedErr != "" {
|
|
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, err, tc.expectedErr)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert.NilError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sort.Strings(removed)
|
|
|
|
assert.DeepEqual(t, removed, []string{"mycontainer", "nosuchcontainer"})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
Return zero exit-code when force-removing non-existing containers
When using `docker rm` / `docker container rm` with the `-f` / `--force` option, attempts to remove non-existing containers should print a warning, but should return a zero exit code ("successful").
Currently, a non-zero exit code is returned, marking the removal as "failed";
$ docker rm -fv 798c9471b695
Error: No such container: 798c9471b695
$ echo $?
1
The command should match the behavior of `rm` / `rm -f`, with the exception that
a warning is printed (instead of silently ignored):
Running `rm` with `-f` silences output and returns a zero exit code:
touch some-file && rm -f no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
mkdir some-directory && rm -rf no-such-directory some-directory; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# exit code: 0
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 12:17 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
Note that other reasons for a delete to fail should still result in a non-zero
exit code, matching the behavior of `rm`. For instance, in the example below,
the `rm` failed because directories can only be removed if the `-r` option is used;
touch some-file && mkdir some-directory && rm -f some-directory no-such-file some-file; echo exit code: $?; ls -la
# rm: some-directory: is a directory
# exit code: 1
# total 0
# drwxr-xr-x 3 sebastiaan staff 96 Aug 14 14:15 .
# drwxr-xr-x 199 sebastiaan staff 6368 Aug 14 12:13 ..
# drwxr-xr-x 2 sebastiaan staff 64 Aug 14 14:15 some-directory
This patch updates the `docker rm` / `docker container rm` command to not produce
an error when attempting to remove a missing containers, and instead only print
the error, but return a zero (0) exit code.
With this patch applied:
docker create --name mycontainer busybox \
&& docker rm nosuchcontainer mycontainer; \
echo exit code: $?; \
docker ps -a --filter name=mycontainer
# df23cc8573f00e97d6e948b48d9ea7d75ce3b4faaab4fe1d3458d3bfa451f39d
# mycontainer
# Error: No such container: nosuchcontainer
# exit code: 0
# CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
2020-08-14 10:04:32 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|